PDA

View Full Version : flint fishooks


kc65
01-29-2010, 10:00 PM
Has anyone ever seen or posess flint fish hooks? Ive heard they are very rare, if they exist at all

old creek warrior
01-30-2010, 08:43 AM
Ive always heard flint fish hooks are fakes

bolenman
01-30-2010, 01:27 PM
hahahahahaha no i have not seen one.I dont think there is any...real ones anyway.JMOP

mtskinner
01-30-2010, 01:37 PM
KC just type in fish hook under the search icon and it will pull up a thread that somewhat discussed the topic! Alot of guys on here will frown if you talk about hooks not made of bone; as most flint fish hooks are typically modern made! There are some that have been documented but they are very rare!

kc65
01-30-2010, 04:06 PM
i know of a woman here in lee co. who several yrs back asked me to look at her late husbands collection of artifacts, they were very private couple no one even knew they had thousands of artifacts all found on their hog farm...celts,pestules,grinding stones and bowls and points by the hundreds the only items she had in a frame were very small arrowpoints beads hair pins and one fishook from flint never mentioned it to her. i still bump into her occasionally..I believe they do exist in obscure collections like hers...

kc65
01-30-2010, 04:10 PM
point to ponder...how could one be authenticated?

kc65
01-30-2010, 04:15 PM
I believe you and i believe i have seen one also am going to call her up and c if i can get one more priveliged look at her collection

Hernandoman
01-30-2010, 04:45 PM
kc, I think they exist as well, although I think they are very rare. No doubt there are fake ones as well but I think there are some authentic old examples. Should be able to look at patination, etc.... to be able to tell if old.

The thing is though, if they are not that old, say Mississippian for example, they wouldnt have heavy patination anyway, depending on the soil, where found, etc...

Fdock
01-30-2010, 06:15 PM
It would be great to see a nice river stained/polished example. That would sure help me decide...

kc65
01-30-2010, 08:52 PM
Hernandoman, Indeed..

kc65
01-30-2010, 09:01 PM
Fdock, it seems to me that we would more likely find flint hooks on landsites other than an aquatic environment, where currents floods etc. would damage the fragile thing.. i would be more suspect of a river example

bolenman
01-30-2010, 09:14 PM
If there is any documented in a report let me know,i will get a copy from u.g.a,it would be new to me but i try to learn something everyday.If they used flint for hooks there should be a lot of them found atlest broke....I would like to here more about the documented examples.Thanks sid

smokster
01-31-2010, 06:21 AM
heres one that i reluctantly show. i friend of mine has a few of these and gave me this one many years ago. he says he found them on the Oklawaha river on a hernando site

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y216/smokster/points/fishook.jpg

Hernandoman
01-31-2010, 07:26 AM
The few that I have seen or heard of, seemed to have more of a ceremonial or decorative context than a utilitarian use. To clarify, I dont know that they were ever used to really "fish" with and I am not sure they were that functional. I could see how they would have been symbolic good luck charms in the next happy huntin grounds or worn for good luck. The picture from over 100 years ago by Moorehead would seem to reinforce this possibility.

Hernandoman
01-31-2010, 07:30 AM
Photo taken around 1907 and was published in Warren K Mooreheads Stone Age of North America in 1910

kc65
01-31-2010, 08:40 AM
Those are all similiar to the one i saw, just different lithics. I would agree as to their being to delicate to have functionality other than adornment etc..Thanks fellas.....

sandchip
01-31-2010, 10:05 AM
I sure don't know, but the one Smokester showed us doesn't look like it would hold a fish long enough to land it, and the one in Moorehead's looks far too delicate to withstand the rigors of a thrashing fish without snapping in half. So maybe Kevin's onto something that they were more of a ceremonial or decorative item, which would better explain their scarcity, if they are indeed genuine.

bolenman
01-31-2010, 11:34 AM
yep i would agree

Buckster
01-31-2010, 02:02 PM
I saw one once in a antique shop in El Paso Ill a few years ago. It had a hole in the shank for the line. I dismissed it because I am always very weary of antique shop artifacts .

iamsharky
02-23-2010, 02:03 PM
kc, I think they exist as well, although I think they are very rare. No doubt there are fake ones as well but I think there are some authentic old examples. Should be able to look at patination, etc.... to be able to tell if old.

The thing is though, if they are not that old, say Mississippian for example, they wouldnt have heavy patination anyway, depending on the soil, where found, etc...

A good friend of mine found one on the suwannee. a white flint, classic fish hook with a groove near the top of the hook for the line. it still had tar residue.

BOLENBEVEL86
02-23-2010, 10:09 PM
Were they used as gaffs?If there hooks ,what was used as string,or fishing line if you will?

sandchip
02-24-2010, 07:58 AM
It does seem like bone would be stronger than flint as a fishhook.

Hernandoman
02-25-2010, 05:27 AM
No doubt that bone was the material of choice for fish hooks. Much more functional, durable, etc.... As far as the few fish hooks fashioned from flint, I think they were more of a novelty than anything else.

kc65
02-25-2010, 10:16 AM
sort of like the gold fishooks worn today on caps n visors